Learning Objectives

After attending this lecture, learners will be able to:

  • Recognize the significance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older patients
  • Describe potential challenges in preventing DDIs
  • Identify clinically significant DDIs involving commonly used antibiotics
  • Determine alternative therapeutic options for empiric treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) and group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis

Presentation Outline

  • Part 1: Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) in Older Patients
  • Part 2: Evidence and Management of Clinically Relevant DDIs
  • Part 3: Putting It All Together – Case Examples
  • Part 4: Conclusion

HOW DO YOU MANAGE DRUG-DRUG INTERACTION ALERTS AND RELATED ISSUES IN YOUR DAY-TO-DAY WORKFLOW AT THE PHARMACY?

Part 1: Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) in Older Patients

Definition

  • Adverse drug event (ADE): An injury from medicine or lack of an intended medicine, Includes adverse drug reactions and harm from medication incidents
  • Drug-Drug Interactions (DDI): One drug alters the pharmacological effect of another drug upon co-administration, which may or may not result in increased, decreased, synergistic, or new and unanticipated adverse drug event

Significance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older patients

Statistics

  • Up to 25% of all hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits
    • ↑ risk in seniors
    • ↑ financial burden
      • Ontario 2007: $333 per ED visit; $7528 per hospitalization
      • Estimated annual cost in elderly population alone (> 66 years old): $13.6 million in Ontario and $35.7 million in Canada
    • Up to 70% of these visits are preventable!

Classifications

Factors increase susceptibility to DDIs

  • Physiological changes ↑ susceptibility to DDIs
    • Body composition ↑ fat mass, ↓ total body water: Lipophilic drug: ↑ Vd, ↑ t1/2, Hydrophilic drug: ↓Vd
    • ↓ renal function: ↓ drug clearance
    • ↓ hepatic blood flow: ↓ drug metabolism
  • Other factors that ↑ susceptibility to DDIs
    • Multiple comorbidities
    • Progression of chronic diseases
    • Polypharmacy
      • Bajcar et al. 20105 revealed that Rx claims ↑ 214% for older adults in Ontario between 1997-2006
      • This far exceeded the 18.5% growth in the population of Ontario adults aged 65 years and older

Challenges in preventing DDIs

(1) Detection of DDIs by clinicians is not optimal

  • Clinicians identified only: 44% of all DDIs, 54% of all contraindicated DDIs
  • 90% of clinicians thought drug alerts would be helpful to identify DDIs
  • 55% perceived most significant barrier to alerts was excess non-relevant warnings

(2) Recognition of DDIs by clinical decision support systems is not optimal

  • Pharmacy computerized DDI systems may fail to detect up to 1 in 3 DDIs
  • Frequent warnings of trivial issues → Operator fatigue → Override of more significant DDIs
  • Lack of regular, reliable updates
    • Large, continuously ↑ number of DDIs
    • Delays in turnaround time for knowledge transfer/translation

 (3) Lack of high-quality evidence of clinically significant DDIs

  • Most data derived from case reports, volunteer studies, etc
  • May contribute to ↓ sensitivity and specificity of computerized drug interaction systems
    • Difficult to determine the clinical significance of DDI alerts, and subsequent actions to manage them

Different approaches to evaluate DDIs…

Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies

  • An approach to evaluate DDIs and their clinical relevance
  • Population-based studies derived from databases (i.e., prescription and health insurance claims data, hospitalization records, demographic information from provincial and national databases ) linking DDIs with real-world, patient-experienced ADEs → ↑ external validity
  • Outcome of interest: Hospitalization → Clinically Relevant DDIs

These clinically significant DDI pairs should be actively screened by community pharmacies!

Part 2: Evidence And Management Of Clinically Relevant DDIs

DDIs involving an antibiotic along with one chronic medication

Why?

  • The majority of DDIs identified from pharmacoepidemiological studies involved an antibiotic
  • Antibiotics for community-acquired infections are usually required for a relatively short duration
  • DDIs involving antibiotics can often be resolved with a different antibiotic(s) from different class(es) → Role for pharmacist intervention.

Uncomplicated UTI

Background

  • One of the most common indications for antimicrobial exposure in an otherwise healthy population
    • Second most common infection among community-dwelling older patients
    • Accounts for ~ 25% of all infection in older adults
    • Signs/symptoms: dysuria, polyuria, urinary frequency/urgency, flank pain
  • Common Pathogens:
    • Escherichia coli (75-95%)
    • Occasional Enterobacteriaceae (Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae)
    • Other gram (-) and gram (+) are rare

Treatment

The following are empiric treatment options for uncomplicated UTIs

  • First Line
    • TMP/SMX 160/800 mg BID x 3 days
    • Nitrofurantoin monohydrate / macrocrystals 100 mg BID x 5 days
    • Fosfomycin 3 g single dose in 90 120 mL of water
  • Second Line
    • Fluoroquinolones x 3 days
      • Ciprofloxacin 250 mg BID
      • Norfloxacin 400 mg BID
    • B lactams x 7 days
      • Cephalexin 500 mg QID
      • Amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg BID

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) In The Treatment Of Uncomplicated UTIS

  • Septra®, Co-trimoxazole®, Sulfatrim®, Teva-Trimel DS®,TMP-SMX
  • Role in treating uncomplicated UTI:
    • Traditional first line agent in uncomplicated UTI
  • Mechanism of action:
    • Interferes with bacterial folic acid synthesis
    • Bactericidal, time-dependent kill
DDIS Involving TMP/SMX

Drug Interaction Pairs

Adverse Outcome

 

Comments

Chronic Medication

Added Antibiotic

ACEI or ARB

TMP/SMX

Hyperkalemia

Antoniou et al. (2010) found that patients on ACEI or ARB who received TMP/SMX had 7x ­ risk for hospitalization due to hyperkalemia within 7 days

Spironolactone

TMP/SMX

Hyperkalemia

Antoniou et al. (2011) found that patients on spironolactone who received TMP/SMX had 12x ­ risk for hospitalization due to hyperkalemia within 14 days

Warfarin

TMP/SMX

Hemorrhagic complications

Fischer et al. (2010) found that patients on warfarin who received TMP/SMX had 4x ­ risk for hospitalization due to hemorrhagic complications within 14 days

Glyburide

TMP/SMX

Hypoglycemia

Juurlink et al. (2003) found that patients on glyburide therapy who received TMP/SMX had 6x ­ risk for hospitalization due to hypoglycemia within 7 days

Phenytoin

TMP/SMX

Phenytoin toxicity

Antoniou et al. (2011) found that patients on phenytoin who received TMP/SMX had 2x ­ risk for hospitalization due to phenytoin toxicity within 30 days

ACEI or ARB

Antoniou T et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole induced hyperkalemia in patients receiving inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170(12):1045 9.

 Study outline

Trial design

Population based, nested case control study

Duration of trial

  • Data collected from April 1994 to March 2008
  • 14 years

Case subjects

  • ≥ 66 years old
  • On continuous ACEI or ARB therapy
  • Hospitalized within 14 days of receiving TMP/SMX, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, or amoxicillin

Outcome of interest

Hospitalization rates secondary to hyperkalemia

Results

Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Hyperkalemia and Recent Antibiotic Use while on ACEI or ARB Therapy

Antibiotic Use in Preceding 14 Days

Cases n (%)

Controls n (%)

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Total

367

1417

 

TMP/SMX

204 (55.6)

323 (22.8)

6.7 (4.5-10.0)

Norfloxacin

20 (5.4)

163 (11.5)

0.8 (0.4-1.5)

Ciprofloxacin

76 (20.7)

413 (29.1)

1.4 (0.9-2.2)

Nitrofurantoin

18 (4.9)

129 (9.1)

1.1 (0.6-2.0)

Amoxicillin

49 (13.4)

389 (27.5)

1 [Reference]

Discussion

  • Hyperkalemia risk with ACEI alone ~ 10% within 1 year of initiation
    • Risk factors: renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, ↓ left ventricular function, advanced age, drugs
  • Trimethoprim
    • Structural and pharmacological similarities to K+-sparing diuretic amiloride
    • Amiloride-like inhibition of sodium channels in the luminal membrane of the distal tube → ↓ K+ excretion by ~ 40%

Conclusion

Among older patients treated with ACEI or ARB, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 7-fold increased risk of hyperkalemia-associated hospitalization. Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.

Spironolactone

Antoniou T et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole induced hyperkalemia in elderly patients receiving spironolactone: nested case-control study. BMJ 2011;343:d5228.

Study Outline

Trial design

•       Population based, nested case control study

Duration of trial

  • Data collected from April 1992 to March 2010
  • 18 years

Case subjects

  • ≥ 66 years old
  • On continuous spironolactone therapy
  • Hospitalized within 14 days of receiving TMP/SMX, nitrofurantoin, norfloxacin, or amoxicillin

Outcome of interest

•       Hospitalization rates secondary to hyperkalemia

Results

Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Hyperkalemia and Recent Antibiotic Use while on Spironolactone Therapy

Antibiotic use in Preceding 14 days

Cases n (%)

Controls n (%)

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Total

248

783

 

TMP/SMX

161 (65)

162 (21)

12.4 (7.1-21.6)

Nitrofurantoin

34 (14)

159 (20)

2.4 (1.3-4.6)

Norfloxacin

17 (7)

137 (17)

1.6 (0.8-3.4)

Amoxicillin

36 (15)

325 (42)

1.0 [Reference]

Discussion

  • Hyperkalemia occurs in up to 1/3 of patients on spironolactone
    • Regular monitoring of electrolytes
    • Caution/avoidance of other medications that can cause hyperkalemia
  • Trimethoprim
    • Structural and pharmacological similarities to K+-sparing diuretic amiloride
    • ↓ K+ excretion by ~ 40%

Conclusion

Among older patients treated with spironolactone, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 12-fold increased risk of hyperkalemia-associated hospitalization.
Nitrofurantoin is also associated with a ~2-fold increased risk.
Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.

Warfarin

Fischer HD et al. Hemorrhage during warfarin therapy associated with cotrimoxazole and other urinary tract anti-infective agents. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170(7):617-21.

Study outline

Trial design

Population-based, nested case-control study

Duration of trial

  • Data collected from April 1997 to March 2007
  • 10 years

Case subjects

  • ≥ 66 years old
  • On continuous warfarin therapy
  • Hospitalized within 14 days of receiving TMP/SMX, amoxicillin, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, or norfloxacin

Outcome of interest

Hospitalization rates secondary to upper gastrointestinal (UGI) hemorrhage

Results

Association Between Hospital Admission for UGI Tract Hemorrhage and Recent Antibiotic Use while on Warfarin therapy

Antibiotic Use in Preceding 14 Days

Cases n (%)

Controls n (%)

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Total

2151

21434

 

TMP/SMX

25 (1.2)

56 (0.3)

3.84 (2.33-6.33)

Amoxicillin or

Ampicillin

30 (1.4)

209 (1.0)

1.37 (0.92-2.05)

Ciprofloxacin

31 (1.4)

124 (0.6)

1.94 (1.28-2.95)

Nitrofurantoin

11 (0.5)

64 (0.3)

1.40 (0.71-2.75)

Norfloxacin

≤5 (≤0.2)

61 (0.3)

0.38 (0.12-1.26)

Discussion

  • Many antibiotics interact with warfarin
    • Antibiotics disrupt gut flora → ↓ intestinal vitamin K synthesis → ↑ warfarin effect
  • TMP/SMX inhibits CYP 2C9
      • CYP 2C9 metabolizes more biologically active S-enantiomer of warfarin → ↑ warfarin effect

Conclusion

Among older patients treated with long-term warfarin, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 4-fold increased risk of hospitalization for UGI hemorrhage. Ciprofloxacin is also associated with ~ 2-fold increased risk. Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.

Glyburide

Juurlink DN et al.Drug-drug interactions among elderly patients hospitalized for drug toxicity. JAMA 2003; 289(13)1652 8.

Study Outline

Trial design

Population based, nested case control study

Duration of trial

  • Data collected from January 1994 to December 2000
  • 7 years

Case subjects

  • ≥ 66 years old
  • On continuous glyburide therapy
  • Hospitalized within 1, 2, and 3 weeks of receiving TMP/SMX or amoxicillin

Outcome of interest

Hospitalization rates secondary to hypoglycemia

Results

Association Between Hospital Admission for Hypoglycemia and Recent TMP/SMX Use while on Glyburide Therapy

Antibiotic Use

Cases, n (%)

Controls, n (%)

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Hospitalization Within 1 Week of Exposure to Antibiotic

TMP/SMX

35 (3.9)

189 (0.4)

6.6 (4.5-9.7)

Amoxicillin

10 (1.1)

246 (0.6)

1.5 (0.8-2.9)

Hospitalization Within 2 Weeks of Exposure to Antibiotic

TMP/SMX

49 (5.4)

319 (0.7)

5.7 (4.1-7.9)

Amoxicillin

13 (1.4)

433 (1.0)

1.1 (0.6-2.0)

Hospitalization Within 3 Weeks of Exposure to Antibiotic

TMP/SMX

56 (6.2)

447 (1.0)

4.9 (3.6-6.6)

Amoxicillin

19 (2.1)

611 (1.4)

1.2 (0.8-1.9)

Discussion

  • Mechanism not fully understood
  • Hypotheses:
    • Inhibition of sulfonylurea metabolism (glyburide) by sulfonamides (SMX)
    • Displacement of sulfonylureas from protein binding sites → ↑ free fraction of sulfonylureas

Conclusion

  • Among older patients treated with glyburide, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 6-fold increase in risk of hospitalization for hypoglycemia.
  • Recommend close blood glucose monitoring during concomitant therapy – dose adjustments may be necessary.
Phenytoin

Antoniou T et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced phenytoin toxicity in the elderly: a population based study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 71(4):544 9.

Study Outlet

Trial design

Population-based, nested case-control study

Duration of trial

  • Data collected from April 1992 to March 2009
  • 17 years

Case subjects

  • ≥ 66 years old
  • On continuous phenytoin therapy
  • Hospitalized within 30 days of receiving TMP/SMX or amoxicillin

Outcome of interest

Hospitalization rates secondary to phenytoin toxicity

Results

Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Phenytoin Toxicity and Recent TMP/SMX Use while on Phenytoin Therapy

Antibiotic Use in Preceding 30 Days

Cases n (%)

Controls n (%)

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Total

796

3148

 

TMP/SMX

25 (3.1)

47 (1.5)

2.11 (1.24-3.60)

Amoxicillin

25 (3.1)

61 (1.9)

1.22 (0.64-1.98)

Discussion

  • Phenytoin
    • Saturable, non-linear pharmacokinetics → unpredictable serum concentrations
    • Metabolized by CYP 2C9, 2C8, 2C19
  • Trimethoprim
    • Potent inhibitor of CYP 2C8 → can ↑ phenytoin concentration
    • Small PK study demonstrated phenytoin clearance was ↓ by 30% when combined with TMP

Conclusion

Among older patients treated with phenytoin, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 2-fold increased risk of phenytoin toxicity requiring hospitalization. Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.

Uncomplicated UTIs Treatment Alternatives To Reduce The Risk Of Hospitalization

Pharyngitis

Background

  • Etiology
    • 30-65% idiopathic
    • 30-60% viral
    • 5-10% bacterial
      • Most common is Group A streptococcus (GAS) aka “strep throat”
      • A significant cause of community-associated infections
  • Typical signs and symptoms: Very sore throat, Fever (T > 38.5°C)

Treatment

  • The following are empiric treatment options for GAS pharyngitis:
  • Penicillin VK 300 mg TID x 10 days
    • [For children] Amoxicillin 500 mg BID x 10 days
  • Cephalexin 500 mg BID x 10 days
  • Azithromycin 500 mg daily x 1 day, then 250 mg daily x 4 days
  • Clarithromycin 250 mg BID x 10 days

 

Macrolides

Mechanism Of Action

 

  • Mechanism of action:
    • Interferes with bacterial protein synthesis
    • Bacteriostatic, time-dependent kill
      • May be bactericidal, depending on concentration and pathogen
Comparisons

 

CYP inhibition

P-gp inhibition

QTc prolongation

GI tolerability

Erythromycin

3A4, 1A2

Yes

Yes

Worst

Clarithromycin

3A4

Yes

Yes

Better

Azithromycin

None

?Yes

Yes

Best

DDIs Involving Macrolides

Drug Interaction Pairs

Chronic Medication

Added Antibiotic

Adverse Outcome

Comments

Digoxin

Clarithromycin

Digoxin toxicity

Gomes et al. (2009) found that patients on digoxin who received clarithromycin had 15x ­ risk for hospitalization due to digoxin toxicity, while azithromycin or erythromycin use each had 4x ­ risk for hospitalization due to digoxin toxicity

Azithromycin

Erythromycin

Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs)

Clarithromycin

Hypotension

Wright et al. (2011) found that patients on non-dihydropyridine CCBs who received clarithromycin or erythromycin had a 4x or 6x ­ risk for hospitalization due to hypotension, respectively

Erythromycin

Digoxin

Gomes T et al. Macrolide induced digoxin toxicity: a population-based study. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2009; 86(4): 383-6.

Study Outline

Trial design

Population based, nested case control study

Duration of trial

  • Data collected from April 1993 to March 2008
  • 15 years

Case subjects

  • ≥ 66 years old
  • On continuous digoxin therapy
  • Hospitalized within 14 days of receiving erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, or cefuroxime

Outcome of interest

Hospitalization rates secondary to digoxin toxicity

Results 

Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Digoxin Toxicity and Recent Antibiotic Use while on Digoxin Therapy

Antibiotic Use in

Preceding 14 Days

Cases

n (%)

Controls

n (%)

Adjusted Odds

Ratio (95% CI)

Total

1659

6439

 

Clarithromycin

55 (3.3)

16 (0.2)

14.83 (7.89-27.86)

Erythromycin

19 (1.1)

15 (0.2)

3.69 (1.72-7.90)

Azithromycin

16 (0.3)

7 (0.1)

3.71 (1.10-12.52)

Cefuroxime

≤5 (≤0.3)

15 (0.2)

0.85 (0.21-3.41)

Discussion

  • Digoxin: High affinity substrate for multidrug efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp)
  • Macrolides inhibit P-gp : ↑ risk of digoxin toxicity

Conclusion

  • Among older patients treated with digoxin, use of clarithromycin is associated with ~ 15-fold increased risk of digoxin toxicity requiring hospitalization.
  • Erythromycin and azithromycin are also associated with ~ 4-fold increased risk.
  • Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.
CCBs

Wright A et al.The risk of hypotension following co-prescription of macrolide antibiotics and calcium-channel blockers. CMAJ 2011; 183(3): 303-7.

Study outline

Trial Design

Population based, nested case cross-over study

Duration of trial

  • Data collected from Apr 1994 to March 2009
  • 15 years

Case Subjects

  • ≥ 66 years old
  • On continuous calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy
  • Hospitalized within 7 days of receiving erythromycin, clarithromycin, or azithromycin

Outcome of interest

Hospitalization rates secondary to hypotension or shock

Results

Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Hypotension or Shock and Recent Macrolide Use while on CCB Therapy

Macrolide Use in Preceding 7 Days

Use During Risk Interval

Use During Control Interval

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Total Cases of Macrolide Use in Subjects Receiving Long-Term CCB Therapy = 176

Erythromycin

30

6

5.80 (2.25-14.98)

Clarithromycin

77

23

3.70 (2.26-6.06)

Azithromycin

24

16

1.50 (0.80-2.82)

Discussion

  • Calcium channel blockers: Substrates for CYP 3A
  • Erythromycin and clarithromycin inhibit CYP 3A4
    • CCB effect
    • Bailey DG et al. found erythromycin use associated with ↑ felodipine levels by ~ 300% in 12 patients

Conclusion

Among older patients treated with CCB therapy, use of erythromycin is associated with ~ 6-fold increased risk of hypotension or shock requiring hospitalization. Clarithromycin is also associated with a ~ 4-fold increased risk. Consider azithromycin when macrolide therapy is necessary.

Treatment Alternatives To Reduce The Risk Of Hospitalization

Patient receiving

long-term therapy with:

Switch macrolide:

SCENARIO A

 

  • ST, a 68-year-old female, walks into your community pharmacy and states that she has been experiencing increased frequency and a burning sensation upon urination for the past 2
  • She presents you with the following prescription:
  • As you begin processing her prescription, you notice she is currently on several chronic medications, which include:
    • Amlodipine 5 mg daily
    • Digoxin 0.0625 mg daily
    • Glyburide 5 mg BID
    • Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg daily
    • Metformin 500 mg TID cc
    • Salbutamol MDI 1-2 puffs QID prn

ST is at risk of experiencing a drug-drug interaction.

True or False?

ST is at risk of experiencing a drug-drug interaction.

  • Which drug pair may potentially cause an adverse effect resulting in hospitalization?
  • TMP/SMX and Amlodipine
  • Amlodipine and Digoxin
  • TMP/SMX and Hydrochlorothiazide
  • Glyburide and TMP/SMX
  • Glyburide and Digoxin
  • Which drug pair may potentially cause an adverse effect resulting in hospitalization?
  • TMP/SMX and Amlodipine
  • Amlodipine and Digoxin
  • TMP/SMX and Hydrochlorothiazide

(e) Glyburide and Digoxin

  • What clinically relevant adverse outcome may be of concern when TMP/SMX is given with glyburide?
  • Hyperglycemia with ↑ risk of diabetic ketoacidosis
  • Hypoglycemia symptoms with blood glucose < 4 mmol/L
  • Unresolved UTI due to ↓ efficacy of TMP/SMX
  • Skin rash due to ↑ sensitivity to sulfa medications
  • B and C
  • What clinically relevant adverse outcome may be of concern when TMP/SMX is given with glyburide?

(a) Hyperglycemia with ↑ risk of diabetic ketoacidosis

  • Unresolved UTI due to ↓ efficacy of TMP/SMX
  • Skin rash due to ↑ sensitivity to sulfa medications
  • B and C

What is ST’s actual or potential

drug therapy problem?

ST is at risk of experiencing hypoglycemia (weakness, confusion, tremors, headache) secondary to concomitant use of glyburide and TMP/SMX and would benefit from reassessment of therapy for uncomplicated UTI.

  • ST’s recent bloodwork shows normal renal What is/are appropriate

therapeutic recommendation(s) for ST?

  • Ciprofloxacin 500 mg BID x 3 days
  • Nitrofurantoin 100 mg BID x 5 days
  • Patient self-monitoring of blood glucose
  • A or B and C
  • B and C
  • ST’s recent bloodwork shows normal renal What is/are appropriate

therapeutic recommendation(s) for ST?

  • Ciprofloxacin 500 mg BID x 3 days
  • Nitrofurantoin 100 mg BID x 5 days
  • Patient self-monitoring of blood glucose
  • A or B and C

What is an appropriate monitoring plan for ST?

  Parameter

 

Change/Desired Effect

 

Timeframe

Efficacy Dysuria (pain/burning) Absent 2-3 days
Urinary frequency Normalize 2-3 days
Safety Urine discoloration (dark orange / brown) Absent Throughout therapy
GI Upset Absent Throughout Therapy

 

  • PA, a 65-year-old female with NKDA, walks into your pharmacy stating that she has been feeling terrible for the past She woke up this morning with a fever of 38.3°C (axilla) and “the worst throat ache” she has ever experienced.
  • She states that her doctor’s diagnosis is “strep throat,”

and gives you a prescription:

  • As you begin processing her prescription, you notice she is currently on several chronic medications, which include:
    • Diltiazem ER 240 mg once daily
    • Ramipril 5 mg once daily
    • Metformin 1000 mg BID CC
    • Warfarin 3 mg once daily (last INR 2 weeks ago: 8)
    • Lorazepam 1 mg QHS prn

PA is at risk of experiencing a drug-drug interaction.

True or False?

PA is at risk of experiencing a drug-drug interaction.

  • Which drug pair may potentially cause an adverse effect resulting in hospitalization?
    • Diltiazem and Clarithromycin
    • Diltiazem and Metformin
    • Clarithromycin and Ramipril
    • Warfarin and Diltiazem
    • Clarithromycin and Lorazepam
  • Which drug pair may potentially cause an adverse effect resulting in hospitalization?
  • Diltiazem and Metformin
  • Clarithromycin and Ramipril
  • Warfarin and Diltiazem
  • Clarithromycin and Lorazepam
  • What clinically relevant adverse outcome may be of concern when clarithromycin is given with diltiazem?
  • Hypotension
  • Bradycardia
  • Syncope
  • Shock
  • All of the above
  • What clinically relevant adverse outcome may be of concern when clarithromycin is given with diltiazem?
  • Hypotension
  • Bradycardia
  • Syncope
  • Shock
  • What is/are appropriate therapeutic recommendation(s)?
  • Azithromycin 250 mg daily x 5 days
  • Erythromycin ethyl succinate 400 mg Q6H x 10 days
  • Amoxicillin 500 mg daily x 10 days
  • Penicillin VK 300 mg TID x 10 days
  • A and D
  • What is/are appropriate therapeutic recommendation(s)?
  • Azithromycin 250 mg daily x 5 days
  • Erythromycin ethyl succinate 400 mg Q6H x 10 days
  • Amoxicillin 500 mg daily x 10 days

(e) A and D

  • What is/are appropriate monitoring parameter(s)?
  • Phonophobia
  • Throat ache severity
  • Neck stiffness/rigidity
  • Photophobia
  • B and C

SCENARIO B – ANSWER #5

 

  • What is/are appropriate monitoring parameter(s)?

(a) Phonophobia

  • Neck stiffness/rigidity
  • Photophobia
  • B and C

CONCLUSION

 

  • DDIs are preventable adverse drug events that are associated with significant

morbidity and mortality

  • Research has demonstrated an association between specific drug-drug interaction pairs with hospitalization in older patients
  • Healthcare practitioners are encouraged to familiarize themselves with these drug- drug interaction pairs to prevent clinically significant adverse drug events
  • Post category:Pharm.D
  • Post last modified:April 14, 2021