Learning Objectives
After attending this lecture, learners will be able to:
- Recognize the significance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older patients
- Describe potential challenges in preventing DDIs
- Identify clinically significant DDIs involving commonly used antibiotics
- Determine alternative therapeutic options for empiric treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) and group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis
Presentation Outline
- Part 1: Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) in Older Patients
- Part 2: Evidence and Management of Clinically Relevant DDIs
- Part 3: Putting It All Together – Case Examples
- Part 4: Conclusion
HOW DO YOU MANAGE DRUG-DRUG INTERACTION ALERTS AND RELATED ISSUES IN YOUR DAY-TO-DAY WORKFLOW AT THE PHARMACY?
Part 1: Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) in Older Patients
Definition
- Adverse drug event (ADE): An injury from medicine or lack of an intended medicine, Includes adverse drug reactions and harm from medication incidents
- Drug-Drug Interactions (DDI): One drug alters the pharmacological effect of another drug upon co-administration, which may or may not result in increased, decreased, synergistic, or new and unanticipated adverse drug event
Significance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older patients
Statistics
- Up to 25% of all hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits
- ↑ risk in seniors
- ↑ financial burden
- Ontario 2007: $333 per ED visit; $7528 per hospitalization
- Estimated annual cost in elderly population alone (> 66 years old): $13.6 million in Ontario and $35.7 million in Canada
- Up to 70% of these visits are preventable!
Classifications
- Pharmacokinetic (PK): Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and/or excretion (ADME) of one drug is altered by another drug.
- Pharmacodynamic (PD): Response of one drug is altered by another drug without changes in the PK of the original drug
Factors increase susceptibility to DDIs
- Physiological changes ↑ susceptibility to DDIs
- Body composition ↑ fat mass, ↓ total body water: Lipophilic drug: ↑ Vd, ↑ t1/2, Hydrophilic drug: ↓Vd
- ↓ renal function: ↓ drug clearance
- ↓ hepatic blood flow: ↓ drug metabolism
- Other factors that ↑ susceptibility to DDIs
- Multiple comorbidities
- Progression of chronic diseases
- Polypharmacy
- Bajcar et al. 20105 revealed that Rx claims ↑ 214% for older adults in Ontario between 1997-2006
- This far exceeded the 18.5% growth in the population of Ontario adults aged 65 years and older
Challenges in preventing DDIs
(1) Detection of DDIs by clinicians is not optimal
- Clinicians identified only: 44% of all DDIs, 54% of all contraindicated DDIs
- 90% of clinicians thought drug alerts would be helpful to identify DDIs
- 55% perceived most significant barrier to alerts was excess non-relevant warnings
(2) Recognition of DDIs by clinical decision support systems is not optimal
- Pharmacy computerized DDI systems may fail to detect up to 1 in 3 DDIs
- Frequent warnings of trivial issues → Operator fatigue → Override of more significant DDIs
- Lack of regular, reliable updates
- Large, continuously ↑ number of DDIs
- Delays in turnaround time for knowledge transfer/translation
(3) Lack of high-quality evidence of clinically significant DDIs
- Most data derived from case reports, volunteer studies, etc
- May contribute to ↓ sensitivity and specificity of computerized drug interaction systems
- Difficult to determine the clinical significance of DDI alerts, and subsequent actions to manage them
Different approaches to evaluate DDIs…
Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies
- An approach to evaluate DDIs and their clinical relevance
- Population-based studies derived from databases (i.e., prescription and health insurance claims data, hospitalization records, demographic information from provincial and national databases ) linking DDIs with real-world, patient-experienced ADEs → ↑ external validity
- Outcome of interest: Hospitalization → Clinically Relevant DDIs
These clinically significant DDI pairs should be actively screened by community pharmacies!
Part 2: Evidence And Management Of Clinically Relevant DDIs
DDIs involving an antibiotic along with one chronic medication
Why?
- The majority of DDIs identified from pharmacoepidemiological studies involved an antibiotic
- Antibiotics for community-acquired infections are usually required for a relatively short duration
- DDIs involving antibiotics can often be resolved with a different antibiotic(s) from different class(es) → Role for pharmacist intervention.
Uncomplicated UTI
Background
- One of the most common indications for antimicrobial exposure in an otherwise healthy population
- Second most common infection among community-dwelling older patients
- Accounts for ~ 25% of all infection in older adults
- Signs/symptoms: dysuria, polyuria, urinary frequency/urgency, flank pain
- Common Pathogens:
- Escherichia coli (75-95%)
- Occasional Enterobacteriaceae (Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae)
- Other gram (-) and gram (+) are rare
Treatment
The following are empiric treatment options for uncomplicated UTIs
- First Line
- TMP/SMX 160/800 mg BID x 3 days
- Nitrofurantoin monohydrate / macrocrystals 100 mg BID x 5 days
- Fosfomycin 3 g single dose in 90 120 mL of water
- Second Line
- Fluoroquinolones x 3 days
- Ciprofloxacin 250 mg BID
- Norfloxacin 400 mg BID
- B lactams x 7 days
- Cephalexin 500 mg QID
- Amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg BID
- Fluoroquinolones x 3 days
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) In The Treatment Of Uncomplicated UTIS
- Septra®, Co-trimoxazole®, Sulfatrim®, Teva-Trimel DS®,TMP-SMX
- Role in treating uncomplicated UTI:
- Traditional first line agent in uncomplicated UTI
- Mechanism of action:
- Interferes with bacterial folic acid synthesis
- Bactericidal, time-dependent kill
DDIS Involving TMP/SMX
Drug Interaction Pairs |
Adverse Outcome |
Comments |
|
Chronic Medication |
Added Antibiotic |
||
ACEI or ARB |
TMP/SMX |
Hyperkalemia |
Antoniou et al. (2010) found that patients on ACEI or ARB who received TMP/SMX had 7x risk for hospitalization due to hyperkalemia within 7 days |
TMP/SMX |
Hyperkalemia |
Antoniou et al. (2011) found that patients on spironolactone who received TMP/SMX had 12x risk for hospitalization due to hyperkalemia within 14 days |
|
Warfarin |
TMP/SMX |
Hemorrhagic complications |
Fischer et al. (2010) found that patients on warfarin who received TMP/SMX had 4x risk for hospitalization due to hemorrhagic complications within 14 days |
Glyburide |
TMP/SMX |
Hypoglycemia |
Juurlink et al. (2003) found that patients on glyburide therapy who received TMP/SMX had 6x risk for hospitalization due to hypoglycemia within 7 days |
Phenytoin |
TMP/SMX |
Phenytoin toxicity |
Antoniou et al. (2011) found that patients on phenytoin who received TMP/SMX had 2x risk for hospitalization due to phenytoin toxicity within 30 days |
ACEI or ARB
Antoniou T et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole induced hyperkalemia in patients receiving inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170(12):1045 9.
Study outline
Trial design |
Population based, nested case control study |
Duration of trial |
|
Case subjects |
|
Outcome of interest |
Hospitalization rates secondary to hyperkalemia |
Results
Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Hyperkalemia and Recent Antibiotic Use while on ACEI or ARB Therapy |
|||
Antibiotic Use in Preceding 14 Days |
Cases n (%) |
Controls n (%) |
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
Total |
367 |
1417 |
|
TMP/SMX |
204 (55.6) |
323 (22.8) |
6.7 (4.5-10.0) |
Norfloxacin |
20 (5.4) |
163 (11.5) |
0.8 (0.4-1.5) |
Ciprofloxacin |
76 (20.7) |
413 (29.1) |
1.4 (0.9-2.2) |
Nitrofurantoin |
18 (4.9) |
129 (9.1) |
1.1 (0.6-2.0) |
Amoxicillin |
49 (13.4) |
389 (27.5) |
1 [Reference] |
Discussion
- Hyperkalemia risk with ACEI alone ~ 10% within 1 year of initiation
- Risk factors: renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, ↓ left ventricular function, advanced age, drugs
- Trimethoprim
- Structural and pharmacological similarities to K+-sparing diuretic amiloride
- Amiloride-like inhibition of sodium channels in the luminal membrane of the distal tube → ↓ K+ excretion by ~ 40%
Conclusion
Among older patients treated with ACEI or ARB, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 7-fold increased risk of hyperkalemia-associated hospitalization. Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.
Spironolactone
Antoniou T et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole induced hyperkalemia in elderly patients receiving spironolactone: nested case-control study. BMJ 2011;343:d5228.
Study Outline
Trial design |
• Population based, nested case control study |
Duration of trial |
|
Case subjects |
|
Outcome of interest |
• Hospitalization rates secondary to hyperkalemia |
Results
Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Hyperkalemia and Recent Antibiotic Use while on Spironolactone Therapy |
|||
Antibiotic use in Preceding 14 days |
Cases n (%) |
Controls n (%) |
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
Total |
248 |
783 |
|
TMP/SMX |
161 (65) |
162 (21) |
12.4 (7.1-21.6) |
Nitrofurantoin |
34 (14) |
159 (20) |
2.4 (1.3-4.6) |
Norfloxacin |
17 (7) |
137 (17) |
1.6 (0.8-3.4) |
Amoxicillin |
36 (15) |
325 (42) |
1.0 [Reference] |
Discussion
- Hyperkalemia occurs in up to 1/3 of patients on spironolactone
- Regular monitoring of electrolytes
- Caution/avoidance of other medications that can cause hyperkalemia
- Trimethoprim
- Structural and pharmacological similarities to K+-sparing diuretic amiloride
- ↓ K+ excretion by ~ 40%
Conclusion
Among older patients treated with spironolactone, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 12-fold increased risk of hyperkalemia-associated hospitalization.
Nitrofurantoin is also associated with a ~2-fold increased risk.
Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.
Warfarin
Fischer HD et al. Hemorrhage during warfarin therapy associated with cotrimoxazole and other urinary tract anti-infective agents. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170(7):617-21.
Study outline
Trial design |
Population-based, nested case-control study |
Duration of trial |
|
Case subjects |
|
Outcome of interest |
Hospitalization rates secondary to upper gastrointestinal (UGI) hemorrhage |
Results
Association Between Hospital Admission for UGI Tract Hemorrhage and Recent Antibiotic Use while on Warfarin therapy |
|||
Antibiotic Use in Preceding 14 Days |
Cases n (%) |
Controls n (%) |
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
Total |
2151 |
21434 |
|
TMP/SMX |
25 (1.2) |
56 (0.3) |
3.84 (2.33-6.33) |
Amoxicillin or Ampicillin |
30 (1.4) |
209 (1.0) |
1.37 (0.92-2.05) |
Ciprofloxacin |
31 (1.4) |
124 (0.6) |
1.94 (1.28-2.95) |
Nitrofurantoin |
11 (0.5) |
64 (0.3) |
1.40 (0.71-2.75) |
Norfloxacin |
≤5 (≤0.2) |
61 (0.3) |
0.38 (0.12-1.26) |
Discussion
- Many antibiotics interact with warfarin
- Antibiotics disrupt gut flora → ↓ intestinal vitamin K synthesis → ↑ warfarin effect
- TMP/SMX inhibits CYP 2C9
-
- CYP 2C9 metabolizes more biologically active S-enantiomer of warfarin → ↑ warfarin effect
-
Conclusion
Among older patients treated with long-term warfarin, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 4-fold increased risk of hospitalization for UGI hemorrhage. Ciprofloxacin is also associated with ~ 2-fold increased risk. Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.
Glyburide
Juurlink DN et al.Drug-drug interactions among elderly patients hospitalized for drug toxicity. JAMA 2003; 289(13)1652 8.
Study Outline
Trial design |
Population based, nested case control study |
Duration of trial |
|
Case subjects |
|
Outcome of interest |
Hospitalization rates secondary to hypoglycemia |
Results
Association Between Hospital Admission for Hypoglycemia and Recent TMP/SMX Use while on Glyburide Therapy |
|||
Antibiotic Use |
Cases, n (%) |
Controls, n (%) |
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
Hospitalization Within 1 Week of Exposure to Antibiotic |
|||
TMP/SMX |
35 (3.9) |
189 (0.4) |
6.6 (4.5-9.7) |
Amoxicillin |
10 (1.1) |
246 (0.6) |
1.5 (0.8-2.9) |
Hospitalization Within 2 Weeks of Exposure to Antibiotic |
|||
TMP/SMX |
49 (5.4) |
319 (0.7) |
5.7 (4.1-7.9) |
Amoxicillin |
13 (1.4) |
433 (1.0) |
1.1 (0.6-2.0) |
Hospitalization Within 3 Weeks of Exposure to Antibiotic |
|||
TMP/SMX |
56 (6.2) |
447 (1.0) |
4.9 (3.6-6.6) |
Amoxicillin |
19 (2.1) |
611 (1.4) |
1.2 (0.8-1.9) |
Discussion
- Mechanism not fully understood
- Hypotheses:
- Inhibition of sulfonylurea metabolism (glyburide) by sulfonamides (SMX)
- Displacement of sulfonylureas from protein binding sites → ↑ free fraction of sulfonylureas
Conclusion
- Among older patients treated with glyburide, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 6-fold increase in risk of hospitalization for hypoglycemia.
- Recommend close blood glucose monitoring during concomitant therapy – dose adjustments may be necessary.
Phenytoin
Antoniou T et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced phenytoin toxicity in the elderly: a population based study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 71(4):544 9.
Study Outlet
Trial design |
Population-based, nested case-control study |
Duration of trial |
|
Case subjects |
|
Outcome of interest |
Hospitalization rates secondary to phenytoin toxicity |
Results
Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Phenytoin Toxicity and Recent TMP/SMX Use while on Phenytoin Therapy | |||
Antibiotic Use in Preceding 30 Days |
Cases n (%) |
Controls n (%) |
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
Total |
796 |
3148 |
|
TMP/SMX |
25 (3.1) |
47 (1.5) |
2.11 (1.24-3.60) |
Amoxicillin |
25 (3.1) |
61 (1.9) |
1.22 (0.64-1.98) |
Discussion
- Phenytoin
- Saturable, non-linear pharmacokinetics → unpredictable serum concentrations
- Metabolized by CYP 2C9, 2C8, 2C19
- Trimethoprim
- Potent inhibitor of CYP 2C8 → can ↑ phenytoin concentration
- Small PK study demonstrated phenytoin clearance was ↓ by 30% when combined with TMP
Conclusion
Among older patients treated with phenytoin, use of TMP/SMX is associated with ~ 2-fold increased risk of phenytoin toxicity requiring hospitalization. Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.
Uncomplicated UTIs Treatment Alternatives To Reduce The Risk Of Hospitalization
Pharyngitis
Background
- Etiology
- 30-65% idiopathic
- 30-60% viral
- 5-10% bacterial
- Most common is Group A streptococcus (GAS) aka “strep throat”
- A significant cause of community-associated infections
- Typical signs and symptoms: Very sore throat, Fever (T > 38.5°C)
Treatment
- The following are empiric treatment options for GAS pharyngitis:
- Penicillin VK 300 mg TID x 10 days
- [For children] Amoxicillin 500 mg BID x 10 days
- Cephalexin 500 mg BID x 10 days
- Azithromycin 500 mg daily x 1 day, then 250 mg daily x 4 days
- Clarithromycin 250 mg BID x 10 days
Macrolides
Mechanism Of Action
- Mechanism of action:
- Interferes with bacterial protein synthesis
- Bacteriostatic, time-dependent kill
- May be bactericidal, depending on concentration and pathogen
Comparisons
|
CYP inhibition |
P-gp inhibition |
QTc prolongation |
GI tolerability |
Erythromycin |
3A4, 1A2 |
Yes |
Yes |
Worst |
Clarithromycin |
3A4 |
Yes |
Yes |
Better |
Azithromycin |
None |
?Yes |
Yes |
Best |
DDIs Involving Macrolides
Drug Interaction Pairs |
|||
Chronic Medication |
Added Antibiotic |
Adverse Outcome |
Comments |
Digoxin |
Clarithromycin |
Digoxin toxicity |
Gomes et al. (2009) found that patients on digoxin who received clarithromycin had 15x risk for hospitalization due to digoxin toxicity, while azithromycin or erythromycin use each had 4x risk for hospitalization due to digoxin toxicity |
Azithromycin |
|||
Erythromycin |
|||
Clarithromycin |
Hypotension |
Wright et al. (2011) found that patients on non-dihydropyridine CCBs who received clarithromycin or erythromycin had a 4x or 6x risk for hospitalization due to hypotension, respectively |
|
Erythromycin |
Digoxin
Gomes T et al. Macrolide induced digoxin toxicity: a population-based study. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2009; 86(4): 383-6.
Study Outline
Trial design |
Population based, nested case control study |
Duration of trial |
|
Case subjects |
|
Outcome of interest |
Hospitalization rates secondary to digoxin toxicity |
Results
Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Digoxin Toxicity and Recent Antibiotic Use while on Digoxin Therapy |
|||
Antibiotic Use in Preceding 14 Days |
Cases n (%) |
Controls n (%) |
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
Total |
1659 |
6439 |
|
Clarithromycin |
55 (3.3) |
16 (0.2) |
14.83 (7.89-27.86) |
Erythromycin |
19 (1.1) |
15 (0.2) |
3.69 (1.72-7.90) |
Azithromycin |
16 (0.3) |
7 (0.1) |
3.71 (1.10-12.52) |
Cefuroxime |
≤5 (≤0.3) |
15 (0.2) |
0.85 (0.21-3.41) |
Discussion
- Digoxin: High affinity substrate for multidrug efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp)
- Macrolides inhibit P-gp : ↑ risk of digoxin toxicity
Conclusion
- Among older patients treated with digoxin, use of clarithromycin is associated with ~ 15-fold increased risk of digoxin toxicity requiring hospitalization.
- Erythromycin and azithromycin are also associated with ~ 4-fold increased risk.
- Consider using alternative antibiotic therapy whenever possible.
CCBs
Wright A et al.The risk of hypotension following co-prescription of macrolide antibiotics and calcium-channel blockers. CMAJ 2011; 183(3): 303-7.
Study outline
Trial Design |
Population based, nested case cross-over study |
Duration of trial |
|
Case Subjects |
|
Outcome of interest |
Hospitalization rates secondary to hypotension or shock |
Results
Association Between Hospital Admission Involving Hypotension or Shock and Recent Macrolide Use while on CCB Therapy |
|||
Macrolide Use in Preceding 7 Days |
Use During Risk Interval |
Use During Control Interval |
Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
Total Cases of Macrolide Use in Subjects Receiving Long-Term CCB Therapy = 176 |
|||
Erythromycin |
30 |
6 |
5.80 (2.25-14.98) |
Clarithromycin |
77 |
23 |
3.70 (2.26-6.06) |
Azithromycin |
24 |
16 |
1.50 (0.80-2.82) |
Discussion
- Calcium channel blockers: Substrates for CYP 3A
- Erythromycin and clarithromycin inhibit CYP 3A4
- ↑ CCB effect
- Bailey DG et al. found erythromycin use associated with ↑ felodipine levels by ~ 300% in 12 patients
Conclusion
Among older patients treated with CCB therapy, use of erythromycin is associated with ~ 6-fold increased risk of hypotension or shock requiring hospitalization. Clarithromycin is also associated with a ~ 4-fold increased risk. Consider azithromycin when macrolide therapy is necessary.
Treatment Alternatives To Reduce The Risk Of Hospitalization
Patient receiving
long-term therapy with:
Switch macrolide:
SCENARIO A
- ST, a 68-year-old female, walks into your community pharmacy and states that she has been experiencing increased frequency and a burning sensation upon urination for the past 2
- She presents you with the following prescription:
- As you begin processing her prescription, you notice she is currently on several chronic medications, which include:
- Amlodipine 5 mg daily
- Digoxin 0.0625 mg daily
- Glyburide 5 mg BID
- Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg daily
- Metformin 500 mg TID cc
- Salbutamol MDI 1-2 puffs QID prn
ST is at risk of experiencing a drug-drug interaction.
True or False?
ST is at risk of experiencing a drug-drug interaction.
- Which drug pair may potentially cause an adverse effect resulting in hospitalization?
- TMP/SMX and Amlodipine
- Amlodipine and Digoxin
- TMP/SMX and Hydrochlorothiazide
- Glyburide and TMP/SMX
- Glyburide and Digoxin
- Which drug pair may potentially cause an adverse effect resulting in hospitalization?
- TMP/SMX and Amlodipine
- Amlodipine and Digoxin
- TMP/SMX and Hydrochlorothiazide
(e) Glyburide and Digoxin
- What clinically relevant adverse outcome may be of concern when TMP/SMX is given with glyburide?
- Hyperglycemia with ↑ risk of diabetic ketoacidosis
- Hypoglycemia symptoms with blood glucose < 4 mmol/L
- Unresolved UTI due to ↓ efficacy of TMP/SMX
- Skin rash due to ↑ sensitivity to sulfa medications
- B and C
- What clinically relevant adverse outcome may be of concern when TMP/SMX is given with glyburide?
(a) Hyperglycemia with ↑ risk of diabetic ketoacidosis
- Unresolved UTI due to ↓ efficacy of TMP/SMX
- Skin rash due to ↑ sensitivity to sulfa medications
- B and C
What is ST’s actual or potential
drug therapy problem?
ST is at risk of experiencing hypoglycemia (weakness, confusion, tremors, headache) secondary to concomitant use of glyburide and TMP/SMX and would benefit from reassessment of therapy for uncomplicated UTI.
- ST’s recent bloodwork shows normal renal What is/are appropriate
therapeutic recommendation(s) for ST?
- Ciprofloxacin 500 mg BID x 3 days
- Nitrofurantoin 100 mg BID x 5 days
- Patient self-monitoring of blood glucose
- A or B and C
- B and C
- ST’s recent bloodwork shows normal renal What is/are appropriate
therapeutic recommendation(s) for ST?
- Ciprofloxacin 500 mg BID x 3 days
- Nitrofurantoin 100 mg BID x 5 days
- Patient self-monitoring of blood glucose
- A or B and C
What is an appropriate monitoring plan for ST?
Parameter |
Change/Desired Effect |
Timeframe |
|
Efficacy | Dysuria (pain/burning) | Absent | 2-3 days |
Urinary frequency | Normalize | 2-3 days | |
Safety | Urine discoloration (dark orange / brown) | Absent | Throughout therapy |
GI Upset | Absent | Throughout Therapy |
- PA, a 65-year-old female with NKDA, walks into your pharmacy stating that she has been feeling terrible for the past She woke up this morning with a fever of 38.3°C (axilla) and “the worst throat ache” she has ever experienced.
- She states that her doctor’s diagnosis is “strep throat,”
and gives you a prescription:
- As you begin processing her prescription, you notice she is currently on several chronic medications, which include:
- Diltiazem ER 240 mg once daily
- Ramipril 5 mg once daily
- Metformin 1000 mg BID CC
- Warfarin 3 mg once daily (last INR 2 weeks ago: 8)
- Lorazepam 1 mg QHS prn
PA is at risk of experiencing a drug-drug interaction.
True or False?
PA is at risk of experiencing a drug-drug interaction.
- Which drug pair may potentially cause an adverse effect resulting in hospitalization?
- Diltiazem and Clarithromycin
- Diltiazem and Metformin
- Clarithromycin and Ramipril
- Warfarin and Diltiazem
- Clarithromycin and Lorazepam
- Which drug pair may potentially cause an adverse effect resulting in hospitalization?
- Diltiazem and Metformin
- Clarithromycin and Ramipril
- Warfarin and Diltiazem
- Clarithromycin and Lorazepam
- What clinically relevant adverse outcome may be of concern when clarithromycin is given with diltiazem?
- Hypotension
- Bradycardia
- Syncope
- Shock
- All of the above
- What clinically relevant adverse outcome may be of concern when clarithromycin is given with diltiazem?
- Hypotension
- Bradycardia
- Syncope
- Shock
- What is/are appropriate therapeutic recommendation(s)?
- Azithromycin 250 mg daily x 5 days
- Erythromycin ethyl succinate 400 mg Q6H x 10 days
- Amoxicillin 500 mg daily x 10 days
- Penicillin VK 300 mg TID x 10 days
- A and D
- What is/are appropriate therapeutic recommendation(s)?
- Azithromycin 250 mg daily x 5 days
- Erythromycin ethyl succinate 400 mg Q6H x 10 days
- Amoxicillin 500 mg daily x 10 days
(e) A and D
- What is/are appropriate monitoring parameter(s)?
- Phonophobia
- Throat ache severity
- Neck stiffness/rigidity
- Photophobia
- B and C
SCENARIO B – ANSWER #5
- What is/are appropriate monitoring parameter(s)?
(a) Phonophobia
- Neck stiffness/rigidity
- Photophobia
- B and C
CONCLUSION
- DDIs are preventable adverse drug events that are associated with significant
morbidity and mortality